0
(0)

The Lindsay Clancy trial is entering a seventh day of jury deliberations after a note revealed an 11–1 split and alleged that one juror was not following the law regarding reasonable doubt.

The judge sent the jury back to deliberate and scheduled a juror inquiry to determine whether the holdout juror disagrees with the evidence or is unwilling to follow the law.
——–
Follow Crime Junkie:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/crimejunkiepodcast
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CrimeJunkiePodcast/
Crime Junkie is created and hosted by Ashley Flowers.

Text Ashley to chat about this episode and more:
https://my.community.com/ashleyflowers?t=Hi%20Ashley%21

About Ashley Flowers
Ashley Flowers is the top female podcaster in the U.S. and the host of Crime Junkie, the #1 podcast among women and the #1 true crime podcast globally. As the Founder of Audiochuck, she has built a top-tier podcast production company that has garnered over 2.6 billion downloads, captivating audiences with its gripping storytelling through 10+ chart topping podcasts. Ashley and her team are dedicated to creating responsible true crime content that respects victims and their families.

Follow Ashley:
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ASHLEYFLOWERS/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@ashleyflowerscrimejunkie

Purchase Ashley’s highly anticipated second novel, The Missing Half now! | https://ashleyflowers.com/books

Watch Crime Junkie true crime podcast dedicated to covering the cases we just can’t get out of our heads. Every Monday, host Ashley Flowers on SloppBoxx.Com.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

As you found this post useful...

Follow us on social media!

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

You May Also Like

More From The Creator

18Comments

Add yours
  1. 1
    @Susan_Jill

    Thank you Brittany for explaining all of this. I think maybe this Juror is doing this for the attention? I say PLEASE use an alternate Juror. Those poor children were not given a 2nd try, why should this evil person be given a new trial. Looking forward to continue getting information from you. I think you are a Great Reporter and Journalist.

  2. 6
    @SergioMartinez-e8i

    This case will lose rights to women if she is found not guilty by insanity. Maybe look at the implications it will have for women in high risk situations pilots,doctors, police officers, etc

    • 9
      @SergioMartinez-e8i

      @jma@jmakinitrain2356mple: you get pulled over , your officer just came off maternity leave . She feels perfect fine but notices you look similar to her child. Starts having a break down and you were to be accidentally shot and killed because she had a psychotic break. The prosecution will say that there you were murdered but her lawyers can argue that because of the similarities in this case(if found not guilty) the officer in this case would get a lighter sentence for killing you. Then eventually hiring women would be more difficult because there’s more liability. See everyone sees the short term but never what the long term effects of this case will do.
      You may say nah that will never happen however her lawyer is putting it on the record that women are likely to these psychotic breaks after postpartum, meaning other women are likely to be in the situation. Which we know is not true plenty of women can and do succeed in high risk jobs

    • 11
      @karlabostic5203

      Men have committed “crimes of passion” for centuries. It hasn’t caused them to lose rights.

      The only thing her being found NGRI should do is put a spotlight on mental illness as a whole.

  3. 12
    @marcushadrian6148

    I hung a jury on a pdf case, the women in the jury were all for giving the guy another chance. Of the four men in that jury the only one that did not change his opinion was I. It was clear the women thought “forgiveness” was their duty. The men wanted justice for the 6 yr old girl. The women were all stubborn and unreasonable and one by one the other three guys gave in. I never did, a PDF has no remedy and should be put away for life. Period. The hung jury meant retrial. So be it.

  4. 13
    @yobubbs7374

    State of MA wants her off their debit sheet, her care and rehab is expensive and the liability of having her in the metal hospital with her aggressive civil suits under her belt makes all involved nervous.. prosecution opening was all for show. Imo
    She will be released as soon as they can without it being too obvious. Sad this has become about Lindsay being the victim and not the 3 children.

  5. 15
    @mbbeautea6986

    As a Massachusetts taxpayer, I would be f&cking furious if 1 douche bag is the reason this case needs retrial. And during the cold months too. It’s depressing enough here AS IT IS (well if you’re poor like me it’s depressing & sucky) everyone else gets to travel and do stuff but when u have a crippling mental illness…. That’s where all yr $$goes. For years & years & years!!

  6. 17
    @FloridaBlondie1

    You have to be insane to kill your kids… but Chris Watts killed his whole family including mom and yet, he got prison for life… there should not be any other options… Yes you are insane.. Yes you will go to prison… end of story.. oh… or death penalty.. which is what they all should get …

  7. 18
    @CorporalDeepDick

    I read that “a lone holdout” typically wants to acquit, not convict. But experts following this trail say it’s the other way around.

    The 11 jurors wants to acquit her on grounds of insanity.

    The US legal system is fucked, and I thought my country was shit.

+ Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.