0
(0)

Recent US intelligence assessments indicate Russian President Vladimir Putin could try to test NATO’s resolve by launching a limited attack on an allied country within the next few years, according to three sources familiar with those reports.

The intelligence assessments outline several possible scenarios for Russian escalation, ranging from a cyberattack to a small-scale incursion intended to challenge NATO’s unity and commitment to Article 5, which states that an attack on one member is an attack on all, without necessarily crossing the threshold for an allied response, the sources said.

CNN’s Senior National Security Reporter Zach Cohen talks about his reporting on Putin’s potential attack. Former CIA director Leon Panetta and former Ambassador John Bolton provide analysis. Also, we take a look at Russia’s recent moves to intensify strikes on Ukraine.

0:00 US intel warns Putin could test NATO with limited attack
2:07 Leon Panetta: “It has to be taken seriously”
4:01 John Bolton: “What he smells is fear”
5:42 Russia’s new offensive

Watch 24/7 live news with CNN Headlines: https://bit.ly/4eIvlTr

#News #russia #nato

CNN is the world leader in news and information and seeks to inform, engage and empower the world…brought to you by SLOPPBOXX.COM.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

As you found this post useful...

Follow us on social media!

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

You May Also Like

More From The Creator

20Comments

Add yours
    • 2
      @FalconAndTrident

      I am very glad that you took down your “living with cancer” video. It was very irresponsible.

      Back when I worked at the Cancer Society the organization shifted from “finding a cure” to “living with a chronic illness”. And while we do want to be able to live happy, productive lives even with cancer (I say this as a survivor) *it is very concerning that the shift has moved from “cure it” to “live with it” — a condition that benefits the pharmaceutical industry, not necessarily patients.* I am very concerned about your video.

      Who are you trying to convince?

  1. 8
    @Pierre-EtienneMélet-z4k

    “US Intel Warns” doesn’t have the same ring to it, nowadays. Sounds more like “US Intel Tries To Manufacture Crisis”. Isn’t that unfortunate ?

  2. 10
    @DamienAlexander-Ducroix

    >Russia can’t defeat Ukraine
    >Idiots decide, “Hey, let’s WIDEN the war to get Europe DIRECTLY involved in the fighting.”

    Yeah that’s totally going to help Russia.

  3. 11
    @EraphaseContemplation

    If Russia hits NATO it’s because Nato wanted it and wouldn’t have it any other way … just to make themselves right about the prejudgement against a people they dont like.

  4. 12
    @teresageorgiaabah2489

    Putin, reimburse new money collaterol mineral at siberia to new investment through gold and crude oil invesmwbt to middl east invesentment, to add new money investment to build new investment due to the high inflation movement Instabilities of Globalisation as present thought Putin investor at name of Siberian x by 100 trilion of valuer money share lot by selling prices high with new dividend increases investment at gold mining ,gold product accessories ,gold product devices electronic with management’ of supply

  5. 13
    @vladalex2177

    The old jew is insane, there is no evidence that there ware russians in germany, he just ate to much bullsh.t the past decades

  6. 14
    @EraphaseContemplation

    This has to be the most psychotic weak minded generation in suite and ties and dresses ever to walk the earth…over stupid juvenile reasons to go to NUC war

  7. 16
    @tng2026

    When all those NATO countries have been saying this for 3 years, but you don’t listen until U.S. intelligence says it lol you’re a joke

  8. 20
    @LarsPallesen

    A Russian cyberattack on a NATO country would just be another Tuesday. Seriously, it happens almost every day now. A missile attack on a NATO country on the other hand? That would mean war. BIG difference.
    If I were to guess it would be something in-between the two in severity. Probably a drone attack on important infrastructure, which Russia of course will deny having anything to do with.

+ Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.