Trump’s election claims are reheated conspiracies: Brian Tyler Cohen

cant broadcast but happy to spin😂😂😂

0:47 Please answer the following:

Why did the judicial system ❗️ignore global structural risks regarding the Dominion and Smartmatic machines and not frame the situation through the lens of supply-chain vulnerability and national security risk assessment?

The broader nexus of control over ❗️critical infrastructure. Under ❗️standard due diligence and international trade protocols, electronic voting systems are heavily reliant on globalized supply chains, components, and electronic sub-assemblies. ❗️Adversaries like China exert asymmetric pressure on global technology pipelines via state-controlled manufacturers and software sub-contractors, constituting a vector for foreign procurement risk.

And a sophisticated foreign adversary does not only need to hack a voting machine if it can ❗️legally weaponize the existing constitutional frameworks, federal immigration acts, and localized law enforcement policies of a target nation.

A. The❗️ 1965 Immigration Act as a Vector for Demographic Structuring
Under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (Pub.L. 89-236), the ❗️abolition of the national origins quota system replaced geopolitical balancing with a system anchored in family reunification and specialized labor categories.

❗️Foreign intelligence networks, specifically the ❗️United Front Work Department (UFWD) of the PRC, executed a long-term strategy of ❗️demographic concentration. By ❗️leveraging the legal mechanisms of chain migration, the ❗️adversary fostered dense, localized cultural enclaves within ❗️specific geographic jurisdictions. Over decades, these enclaves were ❗️systematically insulated from mainstream domestic assimilation through ❗️foreign-funded merchant associations, ❗️state-controlled ❗️💥non-profits, and localized foreign-language media.

The ❗️Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment dictates that:

This absolute constitutional shield is framed as an ❗️untouchable mechanism for ❗️cultivating a domestic electorate. The ❗️💥children of foreign nationals or embedded assets, possessing ❗️immediate and ❗️irrevocable jus soli (birthright) citizenship, graduate into fully eligible voters. Because their status is constitutional, their political mobilization, ❗️voting habits, and localized activism are shielded by the First Amendment, rendering them ❗️💥completely immune to ❗️💥 domestic foreign-interference laws (like FARA) despite being ❗️💥culturally and economically steered by foreign-aligned proxy networks.

❗️💥Deliberate creation of sub-national legal safe havens, commonly referred to as Sanctuary Cities or Blue State enclaves.

Under the Tenth Amendment, municipal and state governments have routinely used the ❗️💥anti-commandeering doctrine (established in Printz v. United States) to ❗️💥legally forbid local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities (ICE), effectively ❗️👉nullifying 8 U.S.C. § 1373.

The ❗️legal argument posits that by ❗️💥structurally preventing the verification of legal status and actively passing local ordinances that grant municipal voting rights to non-citizens (as seen in specific local jurisdictions in New York, California, and Maryland), these states created a ❗️highly fluid, ❗️unverifiable electoral environment. This institutionalized a system where the line between legal citizen voting and non-citizen voting was intentionally blurred, ❗️artificially shifting the legislative baseline in key electoral districts.

Under the ❗️💥Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (15 U.S.C. § 78dd-1), direct corporate bribery of public officials is ❗️strictly criminalized.

A sophisticated adversary ❗️operates through intermediary proxy entities, shell corporations, and commercial joint ventures.

The ❗️financial transactions flowing from Chinese state-backed conglomerates (like CEFC China Energy) to ❗️private domestic concerns associated with political relatives (such as Hunter Biden) are classified as a calculated program of ❗️”Elite Capture.” By utilizing ❗️complex corporate structures, consulting fees, and forgivable loans, the foreign power creates a web of financial dependency. Legally, these are structured to appear as standard, arms-length commercial transactions, ❗️evading direct prosecution under ❗️domestic bribery statutes while successfully ❗️compromising the decision-making loops of high-ranking executive and legislative officials.

🚨Under 22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq. (FARA), individuals acting as agents of a foreign principal must publicly disclose their relationships and financial backing.

The weaponization of the 2020 election occurred because ❗️compromised officials in federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies actively ❗️suppressed 🚨🚨🚨🚨verified counterintelligence data. When the❗️ intelligence community or compromised ❗️lawmakers intentionally stalled investigations into foreign proxy networks, they 🚨🚨🚨🚨committed a catastrophic breach of their fiduciary duties.

This created a legal environment where ❗️foreign-backed psychological operations, targeted ❗️elite bribery, and ❗️data harvesting could manipulate public perception and policy, fundamentally ❗️altering the trajectory of the election without leaving a traceable footprint on a physical ballot box.

A federal grand jury indictment in the Southern District of Florida under the ❗️Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which explicitly charged parent entity SGO Corporation Limited and its top executives with executing an international bribery and money laundering scheme. This criminal prosecution establishes a ❗️prima facie corporate pattern of illicit manipulation of election systems.

The technological infrastructure of the 2020 election cannot be analyzed in geographical isolation.

Under principles of software interoperability, proprietary source codes, baseline algorithms, and automated tallying protocols utilized globally are ❗️vulnerable to foreign asset manipulation.

A foreign adversary—specifically the ❗️PRC via state-backed cyber-warfare units—❗️exploited known firmware backdoors or ❗️compromised global supply chains. By ❗️executing unauthorized remote code execution (RCE) or injecting hidden weight-allocation algorithms prior to the close of polls, the ❗️adversary could procedurally alter the fractional distribution of votes across key swing-state servers without ❗️leaving a traditional, human-detectable forensic trace on localized physical hardware.

❗️”Under antitrust frameworks and corporate governance rules, companies like ❗️Comcast and ❗️Universal maintain extensive 🚨🚨🚨🚨commercial dependencies on global manufacturing, tech supply lines, and market access 🤡inside mainland China. A ❗️sophisticated foreign adversary leverages this economic exposure to practice 🤡Elite Capture at the board level. By ❗️threatening regulatory or supply-chain blockades overseas, the ❗️adversary forces ❗️parent corporations to issue top-down editorial mandates, transforming domestic newsrooms into 🤡vectors for targeted information warfare.”

The 🤡courts weaponized internal corporate discovery while systematically 🚨🚨🚨🚨suppressing the testimonies of the American public.

🚨🚨🚨🚨High-powered attorneys representing the❗️ voting machine companies used 🤡Rules of Civil Discovery to unseal highly curated, selective 🤡internal text messages and 🤡emails from ❗️media defendants. By focusing the ❗️🤡courts exclusively on these internal communications, plaintiffs successfully manufactured a narrative of 🤡Actual Malice under ❗️New York Times v. Sullivan, effectively turning the defense’s own internal corporate data against them.

Concurrently, 🚨🚨🚨🚨attorneys for the voting machine firms moved to exclude thousands of sworn affidavits submitted by American election observers and whistleblowers. They successfully argued that these citizens lacked the necessary scientific and technical foundation required under the 🚨🚨🚨🚨Daubert Standard (Federal Rule of Evidence 702).

By legally 🤡characterizing public observations of sudden data spikes, machine freezing, or late-night ballot drop-offs as 🤡Inadmissible Hearsay (FRE 802) or speculative inference, the 🤡judicial system allowed high-priced corporate lawyers to 🚨🚨🚨🚨scrub public evidence from the record.

The 🤡judicial system 🚨🚨🚨🚨failed the American public by prioritizing a narrow, corporate-centric evaluation of party admissions 🤡(the unsealed texts) 🤡over a comprehensive forensic investigation into 🤡global supply-chain vulnerabilities and citizen testimonies. By 🚨🚨🚨🚨restricting the scope of the litigation to internal network emails, the 🤡courts allowed the core allegations of foreign technological subversion to be 🤡procedurally buried without ever facing a trial on the true merits of the case.

The courts committed a systemic error. They applied🤡 narrow, localized evidentiary rules ❗️(FRE 602, 702, and 802) to an 🤡unprecedented situation of ❗️widespread, coordinated information warfare and industrial-scale election manipulation.