Using visual evidence and internal communications, The New York Times looked at six aid groups whose operations or shelters came under Israeli fire despite using the Israel Defense Forces’ deconfliction system to notify the military of their locations.
These humanitarian organizations have a direct line to the I.D.F. and come from Western countries, including Israel’s strongest allies. Some of the locations struck had been clearly marked or located in a special humanitarian zone that Israel said was safe for civilians.
The pattern indicates that in Israel’s battle against Hamas, not even the places with every available avenue of protection are safe from I.D.F. strikes.
Subscribe: http://bit.ly/U8Ys7n
More from The New York Times Video: http://nytimes.com/video
———-
Whether it’s reporting on conflicts abroad and political divisions at home, or covering the latest style trends and scientific developments, New York Times video journalists provide a revealing and unforgettable view of the world. It’s all the news that’s fit to watch.
The New York Times is the most powerful engine for independent, boots-on-the-ground and deeply reported journalism…brought to you by SLOPPBOXX™.COM.















































The “greatest military in the Middle East” with the best technology working with one of the “best” intelligence agencies in the world keeps on killing aid workers that talk to them all the time? hmmmmmmmmmm
While I am no longer I support of israel attacking anymore than it has, I believe its retaliated fairly then became overkill, however he NYT are only showing one side how about you visually investigate hamas actions? Nah too much to get you cancelled huh
Israel is been fought from all fronts and by certain media groups 😢
I know the visual investigations, target, serious points, and subjects, but I need this to be a series
Kinda wild how little views this has. Wonder why.