0
(0)

U.S. forces successfully intercepted an Iranian missile attack in the Middle East on Tuesday, according to U.S. Central Command.

“At 5:45 p.m. ET today, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps forces launched multiple ballistic missiles from Iran in an attempted surprise attack on U.S. forces based in the Middle East. All Iranian missiles were successfully intercepted. U.S. forces remain vigilant and at a high state of readiness.”

LiveNOW’s Anna Marsick has more details.

Subscribe to LiveNOW from FOX! https://www.youtube.com/livenowfox?sub_confirmation=1
Where to watch LiveNOW from FOX: https://www.livenowfox.com
Follow us @LiveNOWFOX on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@livenowfox

Raw and unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX. Live news streaming channel when and where you need it.

SloppBoxx Live lets creators, businesses, and organizations broadcast real-time video to viewers globally. Watch on SloppBoxx.Com.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

As you found this post useful...

Follow us on social media!

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

You May Also Like

More From The Creator

18Comments

Add yours
  1. 6
    @RustyShackleferd-y7f

    If it was a surprise it means usa was not ready. Spin the facts all you want but anyone with half a brain who knows war tactics know your lieing.

  2. 9
    @SilenceBringsAnswers

    I guess the US has to keep saying they are looking for a ceasefire for diplomacy, but the likelihood of a ceasefire is zero to none at this point.

  3. 10
    @AlaskanApple

    “We can’t intercept anymore”
    “We intercepted all missiles”

    I wonder which side is truly bluffing its stockpile. We’ll know soon enough

  4. 11
    @TheFarm5098

    trumps starts a war for nothing , lies about the peace talks and puts America on it’s knee’s with his actions. trump is a fake and corrupt as hell , jail him & his corrupted family plus some of his administration . SAVE AMERICA !! NO more DEAD Americans just for his EGO !

  5. 12
    @mrteacher1315

    ​ @javajeff3772 RE: “US forces will have a new list of targets”

    The United States and Israel have reportedly already struck more than 20,000 targets in Iran. The problem is not identifying additional targets; it is that Iran is structurally difficult to disable through conventional airstrikes.

    1. Iran’s energy infrastructure is highly dispersed. No single power plant supplies even 5% of the national electricity grid, so destroying a few major facilities would not cripple the entire system.

    2. Its water infrastructure is also decentralized. Unlike Israel and several Gulf states, Iran obtains less than 5% of its water from desalination. There is no small number of coastal desalination plants whose destruction would shut down the country’s water supply.

    3. Its mobile military infrastructure is extremely difficult to target. Drones can be launched from small, towable platforms that are inexpensive, highly portable, easy to manufacture, and simple to camouflage.

    4. Its fixed military infrastructure is heavily hardened. Many missile and drone facilities are reportedly buried beneath massive granite mountains and designed to survive even nuclear-scale blast effects—similar in concept to the hardened U.S. command complex inside Cheyenne Mountain. My assumption is that Western intelligence knows the locations of only a fraction of these sites.

    5. Some underground missile systems are rail-based. Launchers can move continuously between firing positions, making fixed-target planning far less effective. After launch, some positions can reportedly be concealed again beneath layers of earth.

    6. Iran can manufacture drones and missiles far faster and more cheaply than the United States can produce many of the weapons used to destroy or intercept them. Iranian systems often cost only a minute fraction of the price of U.S. offensive missiles and air-defense interceptors. That creates an unfavorable long-term cost-exchange ratio.

    7. Iran’s civilian infrastructure and technical workforce are also resilient. Its infrastructure is geographically dispersed, and the country has a highly literate population with a substantial supply of engineers and technicians capable of repairing and maintaining damaged systems.

    The central issue is therefore not whether the U.S. can generate another target list. It can. The issue is whether striking additional targets can produce decisive strategic effects faster than Iran can disperse, repair, replace, conceal, and regenerate what is destroyed.

  6. 13
    @dualexistence

    what does ‘surprised’ mean in this context? Surprised like a child who shook a beehive? Or surprised because he found out it’s a hornets nest and because hornets do not make honey.

  7. 15
    @mrteacher1315

    ​ @Jc3805 RE: “I do agree on getting rid of regime. With this said, Iran has all the right to attack when U.S. and Israel maxe surprise attack first. Of course, its all about unauthorized nuclear weapon building.”

    Before calling for regime change, compare Iran before and after the 1979 revolution.

    Under the U.S.- and Israeli-backed Shah, Iran remained largely semi-feudal outside the oil sector. Literacy, education, healthcare access, industrial capacity, and average life expectancy were all far more limited than they are today.

    Under its supposedly “primitive” Islamic constitution, Iran has developed competitive elections, achieved mass literacy, expanded higher education and healthcare, built major engineering and scientific institutions, and become a significant manufacturing and technological power.

    The nuclear-weapons accusation is also deeply contradictory. The United States and Israel have now assassinated Iran’s religious leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei—the same leader who issued a fatwa declaring nuclear weapons religiously prohibited.

    Iran’s conduct during the Iran–Iraq War is equally relevant. In the 1980s, Iraq used chemical weapons against Iranian soldiers and civilians with Western assistance, including access to chemical precursors. Even after hundreds of thousands of Iranians were killed or injured, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini prohibited Iran from retaliating with chemical weapons.

    And the January protests repeatedly described in Western media as entirely “peaceful” were not uniformly peaceful. Rioters killed emergency personnel and attacked or burned facilities used by firefighters, police officers, and medical workers.

    You can oppose Iran’s government or criticize its policies without erasing its development, misrepresenting its military doctrine, or portraying every act of violence against the Iranian state as peaceful democratic resistance.

+ Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.