Amanda Knox: My reaction was stunned

Sei matto da legare…

@ianslade22 Right out?!! Nice try Vladimir.

Consult the evidence, not a pseudoscience.

When are you going to do that?

That’s quite the statement. But, I’d bet you have virtually no knowledge of the case facts. if I’m wrong, you will state the evidence that proves she’s guilty.

@solaireofastora6951
1) “She gave fault to a innocent person Lumumba”

She was pressured by the police into signing two statements during a late night interrogation of which there is no recording or written transcription. Contrary to Italian law, she was also not provided a lawyer which both the Italian Supreme Cout and the ECHR found to be a violation of her rights. It also ruled her right to an impartial translator was violated. Within hours of her statements, she retracted both statements in writing as also found by the ECHR.

Knox’s main interrogator, Rita Ficarra, admitted in court that at the beginning of the interrogation, she misunderstood a text Knox had sent to Lumumba. After reading his text that she did not have to come to work that night because business was slow, she deleted it and wrote “Ok. See you later, good night.” Ficarra believed that the “see you later” meant that Knox was confirming a meeting with him later that night. Already suspicious of Knox, Ficarra jumped to the wrong conclusion that Knox had met Lumumba and taken him to the cottage. The Chief of Police, Arturo de Felice, confirmed this is what the police already believed BEFORE she signed the statements when he announced to the press that morning,

“Initially the American gave a version of events we knew was not correct. She buckled and made an admission of facts we knew were correct and from that we were able to bring them in. They all participated but had different roles.”

Notice the word “buckled” which means “to bend under pressure or stress”.
Notice that he also admits that the police did not believe Knox’s version of events (that she was not at the cottage that night) and it wasn’t until she agreed to the “facts we knew were correct” by signing the two statements that they ended the interrogation. The trouble is, what they believed they “knew” wasn’t true: Knox never took Lumumba to the cottage at all.

2) “she bought the silence of Rudy Guede that took all the fault and never said anything about her but he said that he wasnt alone either.”

As I thought, you do not know the facts of the case. Bought Guede’s silence? He has repeatedly accused her and Sollecito of being the “real killers” so that is certainly NOT buying his silence. He also never “took all the fault” as he has NEVER admitted any guilt at all.

@mrsmeowmotherfluffer6037 Huh? so why she gave fault to a innocent person? if she wasnt guilty why would she tell lies? She is definetely involved.