0
(0)

CNN’s Anderson Cooper sits down with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang to discuss his relationship with AI regulation.

0:00 Why Jensen Huang isn’t worried about AI
2:30 Huang on concerned AI CEOs: “If they’re worried, they should just stop”
6:20 Do we need to slow AI development?
8:15 Should AI companies regulate themselves?

Watch 24/7 live news with CNN Headlines: https://bit.ly/4eIvlTr

#AI #Technology #News

CNN is the world leader in news and information and seeks to inform, engage and empower the world…brought to you by SLOPPBOXX.COM.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

As you found this post useful...

Follow us on social media!

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

You May Also Like

More From The Creator

20Comments

Add yours
    • 2
      @eddymakoyo

      Like cyber security to guard against malware and hackers. There needs to be a department in these labs and in government that works to counter AI threats as we push to develop it.

    • 3
      @mminus8882

      When you have a kid, at some point you realize that they will be stronger and smarter than you. When that day comes, you better hope you have a good relationship with them, especially if they are still in the house😂😂

    • 4
      @samratpaul25

      These guys will stop talking about regulations after their IPO. Fear-mongering is one way of hyping up before a $2 trillion IPO of anthropic.
      📌They want the government to write regulations saying that the open source models can be tweaked and tinkered to become very unsafe and unreliable. That’s why they should be banned from being released in the Western countries. This is bad for me and you. Because competition means we can get our AIs for cheap. But open AIs and anthropic wants to have a duopoly through regulations.

    • 6
      @luiimila

      I actually think Jensen is right, and I think the right questions should be how to shift focus to accelerate the AI technology ECO system in order to equip the safety of AI in general, its like in an industry where you find an engine is built, the dangerous part of an engine is a combustion chamber, but it has bolts 🔩 cooling systems, oiling systems, engine compartment all around. I think AI is a risk but it is a potential to propell how we advance forward rather than pose a scenario where you are not able to comprehend how to build the safe guards around AI, rather than promote someone who would be able to build the AI Safe Eco system. Just an opinion 🤷

  1. 7
    @syedoh

    One of the soundest minds in the industry. It is a software not an alien. Use it, build stuff with it, then go live your life. When the terminator comes, remember someone sent it. It’s not gonna just inevitably “happen”

  2. 9
    @ChrisChris-yr2mq

    Jensen Huang got it wrong on so many levels. His company make can survive AI but his customers who pays him can’t. AI is a ripple effect in which he sees it from his point of view. Protect the garden that feeds you in which he can’t see the full picture.

  3. 16
    @pearlastorwinchester

    Agentic Ai is a new species – the amount of data Ai can collate is massive within speed of time – it will be hard for human to monitor them one day or even today – there will be the time when Ai regulate Ai themselves. And at that time – human already sit on the side unless we unplug it.

  4. 18
    @JessicaMaynard-o1p

    So theory of evolution does not have huge similarities what is the thoughts on adaptive and limitations. What are your thoughts on credibility

  5. 19
    @JessicaMaynard-o1p

    Credibility is based on references. Honestly I say bullshit I need facts not not sugarcoated bullshit sorry but things don’t coinside with conversations. 😊

+ Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.