Bodycam footage played in court shows investigators pressing Naresh Bhatt about when he last saw his missing wife, Mamta Kafle Bhatt. Detective Claudia Ventura questioned Bhatt about his claim that Mamta was last seen wearing her blue work scrubs, pointing out inconsistencies in his timeline. Bhatt is accused of killing his wife and concealing her body, which has never been found. The defense has challenged the prosecution’s account as the murder trial continues.
Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/
Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/
Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/
Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/join
FOLLOW THE CASE:
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttv
Twitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTV
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/
TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvlive
YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTV
WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE https://www.courttv.com/trials/
WHERE-TO-WATCH https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/
Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today! Join the Investigation Newsletter, follow the FACTS of the case on Court TV social pages on SloppBoxx.Com.
He understands the question they asked about what the wife was wearing on the Wednesday, he just avoiding not to give an answer, why was he donating stuff in the donation box at the gas station with Mamta’s clothing in it,he makes me sick 😡🤢. He speaks good English in other interviews. Throw him in jail for the rest of his life. Justice for Mamta 🕊️🕊️
`Yes he understands every question asked!
This police missed checking his house on 2 nd august when first arrived…they could have found solid proof. This vedio on 14th August.
How is he feeling, listening to his own lies???
I AM BIT BEHIND WITH THIS CASE BUT DID ANYONE UNDERSTAND THE LAST PART OF THE VIDEO? I AM SO CONFUSED….. WHEN PROSECUTOR ASKED THE OFFICER IF SHE EVER SEEN OR APPLIED THE LIQUID, BLUE STAR, SHE SAID YES AND SAID THEY APPLIED THE LIQUID IN THE BEDROOM AND BATHROOM, PROSECUTOR SAID WAS THIS BHRATT HOUSE, SHE SAID NO, AND MENTIONED AN OTHER CRIME SCENE “PRINCE WILLIAM CRIME SCENE”. WHAT I UNDERSTOOD THAT SHE WAS TALKING ABOUT SEEING THE LIQUID BEING USED IN A WILLIAM HOUSE. BUT PROSECUTOR WAS KEEP REPEATING HYMSELF. SO I COULDN’T UNDERSTAND AT THE END, WAS SHE TALKING ABOUT THE WILLIAM HOUSE OR BRATT HOUSE. I THINK PROSECUTOR WAS STILL PUSHING THE QUESTIONS EVEN THO WAS EXTREMELY CONFUSING
CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN PLEASE?
1.57 when was the last time you v been to work?: I have to check…2-3 weeks ago maybe. OMG worked as an IT professional!!!
This idiot allegedly went to pharmacy school and didn’t know that those were Birth control pills and not “abortion” pills
This and that. Here and there. You know. You know . You know🙄🙄🙄🙄