Old Money Luxury
Let’s explore the intriguing “old money” psychology of John F. Kennedy, examining the mental framework that guided his leadership and decision-making.
Through an analysis of personal correspondences, public speeches, and firsthand accounts from those close to him, we aim to piece together the mental landscape of a man whose legacy is as enduring as his impact was transformative.
————————————————————————
How The Kennedys Went From “New Money” To “Old Money”:
————————————————————————
How The Kennedy Women Turned Their Family Into “Old Money”:
————————————————————————
TIMESTAMPS:
0:00 Introduction
1:25 Lesson 1: Understanding of the Kennedy Legacy
4:51 Lesson 2: Intellectual Capital in The Kennedy White House
8:05 Lesson 3: Strategic Intermarriage of The Kennedys
10:58 Lesson 4: “Old Money” Fashion Sense
13:58 Lesson 5: “Old Money” Classiness
17:04 Lesson 6: Privacy and Discretion
————————————————————————
John F. Kennedy, a figure synonymous with American elegance and the forward-looking “New Frontier,” epitomized a blend of “old money” grace and progressive leadership.
Raised in the prominent Kennedy family, his upbringing infused him with a sense of duty and an understanding of legacy, which profoundly shaped his public and private life.
This deep dive into Kennedy’s psychological makeup reveals the complex interplay of wealth, personal style, and intellectual vigor that defined his persona.
Kennedy’s presidency, marked by charisma and an astute political acumen, was also deeply influenced by his understanding of the Kennedy family’s storied heritage.
Positioned by his father to assume a role of political significance, JFK initially stepped into the political arena as a reluctant heir to his elder brother’s ambitions.
However, his embrace of this role was total, integrating the Kennedy name with American politics in a manner reminiscent of the most storied “old money” families.
This strategic maneuvering included appointing his brother, Robert F. Kennedy, as Attorney General, a clear nod to the dynastic influences in his governance.
Intellectual enrichment was another pillar of JFK’s life. His administration, known as “Camelot,” was notable for its incorporation of academics and intellectuals, reflecting his belief in the power of knowledge.
Kennedy’s own writings, including “Profiles in Courage,” underscored his appreciation for the complexities of leadership and moral fortitude.
This intellectual bent was not confined to his personal growth but was a cornerstone of his presidential initiatives, such as the space race, which symbolized the pinnacle of American ingenuity and exploratory spirit.
The personal side of Kennedy’s life was equally strategized.
His marriage to Jacqueline Bouvier was a union that not only aligned with the Kennedy’s socio-political aspirations but also enhanced their cultural and aesthetic influence.
Jacqueline’s sophistication and style greatly amplified the Kennedy allure, making them a global symbol of American royalty.
This strategic alliance was reflective of the “old money” approach to marriage, serving as a powerful tool in the Kennedy’s quest for enduring influence.
Moreover, Kennedy’s style and public demeanor were crafted to resonate with both national and international audiences.
His adept use of humor and a commanding yet approachable communication style were pivotal in his public dealings.
However, beneath this veneer of accessibility was a guarded individual who managed his public image with acute awareness of the implications of personal revelations.
His health struggles and private challenges were kept away from public scrutiny, underscoring the “old money” ethos of privacy and discretion.
Kennedy’s life, therefore, was a masterclass in the balancing act required of “old money” figures, who must navigate public expectations while managing personal legacies.
His presidency, though marked by glamour and public adoration, involved careful curation of his public image, reflecting the enduring complexities of living in the spotlight while guarding one’s private world.
In studying Kennedy, one gains insight into the nuanced role that heritage, personal cultivation, and strategic interpersonal relationships play in the crafting of a public persona that is both influential and endearing, yet selectively private.
%20|%20Oxygen){kind=link}
COMMENT: Which “old money” person from history would you like us to analyze next?
I understand that JFKs father bought Illinois for him
An interesting personality would be Joseph Safra, Lily Safra and his family. Joseph Yacoub Safra was a Lebanese banker, businessman and philanthropist of Syrian origin, naturalized Brazilian. He is the founder of Banco Safra. With an estimated fortune of 23.3 billion dollars in 2020, he was considered the richest man in Brazil and the 37th in the world, according to Forbes. A hug from 🇧🇷 and congratulations on the channel. 👍
How about the Duponds and the Mellons.
Also the Swedish Wallenbergs and the Germans Quandts.
Jackie Kennedy or Ethel Kennedy
This was a good old money episode
Except he wasn’t old money. His father was wealthy due to the bootlegging business, but it was new money.
Captain obvious.
They sure caught on quick though. LOL. How do you define “old money?” If you think of it as an ethos, the Kennedy’s adapted in a generation or less.
@@matthewgales3057not many people know this
@@Arthurian. if we’re talking about the audience of this channel, they do
@@matthewgales3057 you’re still wrong. But hey, don’t let me stop you from being a nasty little disease
Thanks as always for your insight
I am not sure JFK was, by your definition, ‘old money.’ However, they certainly embodied the lessons of old money. This was another outstanding episode.
True, he was not born rich. My high school history teacher grew up next door to him on Cape Cod, and she was upper middle class at best.
An Old Family family from the Coal Operators of Northeastern Pennsylvania! Cheers….😊😊😊😊😊
A brilliant mind with a credible and formidable brain trust, real mastermind. Class act – Camelot – charisma and style par excellence.
I wish this “Camelot” example of “rigorous pursuit of knowledge” and having the “best and brightest” and keeping education in the forefront was STILL a priority!
Thanks a lot. Keep up your good works.
Could have been a GREAT man – too bad his atrocious private behaviour has outshone his achievements! RIP.
Good analysis. How about the Hearst family?
I believe they’ve already done one on the Hearst family
LOL yeah let’s just forget about the sister who had a lobotomy, the brother who killed a woman and Jack’s reputable sleeping around, none of those are old many trades!
And kennedy father and he was womaniser
@@shikshapandey8196yes, and it’s not illegal. Women still want JFK to this day. You mad?
Traits, not trades. You special needs?
The Cabots must’ve been antediluvian money if the Kennedys were old money back then
Can you Jackie or Ethel Kennedy Love this video
Along with all the admirable attributes you assign to the Kennedys, you didn’t include their sense of Noblesse oblige, their arrogance disguised as high mindedness, their ruthlessness disguised by position, their inferred integrity by their ignoring the simmering outrage of their actions, their failure to meet commitments and their cockiness referred to as “style.”
None of the colorful and well expressed sentiments of good will that you ascribe to John Kennedy led him to Dealy Plaza. Under your paint job of the fictitious Camelot veneer were hard ball politicians that waged a furious war for power.
The Kennedys thought the beauty of their ideals was strong enough to overcome the brute force of those who lack any integrity. Both John and Robert Kennedy paid the ultimate price for not understanding the hidden realities of the world that they encountered.
Joe Kennedy was a street brawling rogue who rode roughshod during his time. His final achievement was the purchase of the presidency for his son. Had he not been taken out by that massive stroke, perhaps he might have skillfully helped his son transverse the dangerous path that Joe had wrought.
Without him, John Kennedy didn’t have the inborn anger of the warrior that could succeed against the forces against him. His destiny was not foretold, but, upon reflection, the outcome, understood by the forces aligned against him, was not surprising.