Chess Pro Explains How to Spot Cheaters (ft. GothamChess) | WIRED

“Only a bot would play that!” Sacrificing a Queen in chess is a move you’re much more likely to see a bot make as opposed to a human, as humans want to protect the game’s most valuable piece. In the wake of the recent chess cheating scandal, Levy Rozman from GothamChess explains how you actually cheat at chess. Using artificial intelligence, see how people use everything from bathroom cell phones to ear pieces to try to skirt the rules and gain an edge.

Check out Levy’s YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@GothamChess

Director: Lisandro Perez-Rey
Director of Photography: Charlie Jordan
Editor: Louville Moore
Talent: Levy Rozman

Line Producer: Joseph Buscemi
Associate Producer: Samantha Vélez
Production Manager: Eric Martinez
Production Coordinator: Fernando Davila

Camera Operator: Corey Eisenstein
Audio: Brett Van Deusen
Production Assistant: Patrick Sargent

Post Production Supervisor: Alexa Deutsch
Post Production Coordinator: Ian Bryant
Supervising Editor: Doug Larsen
Assistant Editor: Ben Harowitz

Still haven’t subscribed to WIRED on YouTube? ►► http://wrd.cm/15fP7B7
Listen to the Get WIRED podcast ►► https://link.chtbl.com/wired-ytc-desc
Want more WIRED? Get the magazine ►► https://subscribe.wired.com/subscribe/splits/wired/WIR_YouTube?source=EDT_WIR_YouTube_0_Video_Description_ZZ

Follow WIRED:

Instagram ►►https://instagram.com/wired
Twitter ►►http://www.twitter.com/wired
Facebook ►►https://www.facebook.com/wired

Get more incredible stories on science and tech with our daily newsletter: https://wrd.cm/DailyYT

Also, check out the free WIRED channel on Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, and Android TV.

ABOUT WIRED
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized. Through thought-provoking stories and videos, WIRED explores the future of business, innovation, and culture.

30 thoughts on “Chess Pro Explains How to Spot Cheaters (ft. GothamChess) | WIRED

  1. hearing him say the best players in the world only look 2 or 3 moves in (8:13) was such a relief to hear. i was a chess nerd when I was like 8-12yo … but now in my 40s, I have been poking around again. I always thought I was dumb because I REALLY have to focus to even begin to get to 3 and even 4 moves in. Because, then the trick is, you have to do that again, and then compare those 2 positions mentally … scout for dangerous things the same way like forks or pins … and I always imagined people like Carlsen were going like 10 moves in. so rather than going in deeper, they are probably just a lot faster at it, with better memory for the outcomes. nice. just really good to hear, I thought my senility was already setting in lol

  2. Every person that plays chess should know, atleast 50-60% of every game you play online has some form of cheating by your opponent. Your rank or ELO means absolutely nothing online.

  3. Well, 9:16 Levy said that GMs analyze 2-3 forward moves. This knight and queen sacrifice is actually a 3-move tactics and could be done by a titled player according to this logic

  4. You can call me a bot if you want but if I can take 2 power pieces if I let you take my queen you can get that queen fam, I’ll turn a pawn to a queen later n out you in checkmate.

  5. I am mentally dysfunctional and I still can’t figure out why Black responds as such to NG5+. Why not …FxG5? Or …KE8? I realize capturing the knight with the pawn sets up a discovered attack by white with the rook, but this seems more like a situation of Black blundering themself into mate as opposed to an inevitable mate only a chess computer could foresee.

    1. The ELO system is really the only reason why people cheat.
      Some people dont want to learn and hate being seen as bad, so they artificially pumps up their image to retain their self-esteem.

    1. only if black plays like a beginner and captures. otherwise it gets much more complicated and just leads to material advantage some moves later but that was too much for them to get into. but that’s why it’s an engine line, not because it’s checkmate

    2. @zetacrucis681  No, because the immediate advantage of that move can be immediately seen by any single player who can see literally just 1 move into the future

      The point was that “OMG bots can see advantageous moves *so far* ahead that no one will ever notice!” But the advantageous position is an incredibly simple queen bait… One that only relies on black to make a single move

      Not a single person who would see that move would IRL would ever assume it’s a bot move…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.